Iris vs CaseEasy

Honestly: trial both on real files before you move. CaseEasy has been in this market since 2017 and Iris has not. Iris covers client records, case files, documents, retainers, deadlines and billing, and adds Quebec selection tracking and study-abroad admissions that CaseEasy does not advertise. If there is one specific CaseEasy capability your practice runs on, ask us directly — we will tell you plainly whether Iris does it yet.

We do not quote CaseEasy’s pricing on this page. Vendor plans change, and a stale comparison table is worse than no table at all — read their plans from their own site, and ours from the pricing section at withiris.ca. For a sense of the market: VisaNauta publishes a flat $59–$279/month band with no commission on client fees, which is the only published range we can point to without guessing. In practice this decision comes down to fit rather than a large price gap.

Client records, contacts and case history come across by CSV export and import; documents come across as files. We do the mapping with you rather than handing you a template and wishing you luck — migrating regulated files mid-year is not a thing to get wrong, and a bad import is the most common reason a switch goes badly.

CICC compliance is the price of entry in this category, not a selling point — CaseEasy is built around it and so is Iris, and we are not going to pretend we invented record keeping. Iris writes a full activity trail on every case, carries a projected destruction date on closed files so retention is visible rather than remembered, and can export a complete file when the regulator asks for one. We build compliance to parity and compete on Quebec and on admissions instead.